April 7, 2013
-
KWar Blog #2 – China’s role
There’s quite a lot going on in China now that muscles are flexed once again on the Korean peninsula….
According to my take on the situation…North Korea’s militarism is aligned with a power faction within China, specifically the military. Presently the military is not the ruling faction of China, the businessmen are. The success of business is what has been behind the rise of China in the last 25 years particularly. China does not use fair business practices however because it is dictatorial. So, on the world wide stage, China’s business ruling elite are perched upon unsustainable principles. And they know it.
But, China’s military alliance with North Korea pre-dates the rise of modern China as an economic power. The military bloc inside China wants to rule, but has been kept at bay by continued economic success, and of course, vicious Communist Party politics.
So what do we have? We have INTERNAL stress between power blocs over Kim Dong Bong’s (“fatty Kim” as he is being widely called in China now) current military actions.
As the situation on the peninsula further militarizes, more weight is given to the military bloc inside China. And the military bloc inside China WANTS North Korea to provoke war because war destroys economy, and enhances the chances of the military ruling China.
So what can we expect to see? Will China be taken over by military rule as result of the present Korean standoff?
That is VERY POSSIBLE, and not a pleasant option for the whole world. We should do everything in our power to avoid that.
Therefore what we need to do is placate Kim, once again. It has always worked in the past. These table pounding dramatics are indicative of economic need in North Korea, and a demand for relief. It’s Springtime and there’s no food probably, and the planting season needs energized too….IS that it? Well, this time, I’m afraid, that ISN’T it….
This time we have a new Kim to deal with, a Kim who may have Napoleonic aspirations. We ALSO have a militarism in China that is ready to seize power and seek a local military solution instead of a typical compromise-driven economic solution to the American military blockade of China in the China sea, and Pacific at large. This time North Korea has added some nukes to the mix.
President Obama as Commander-in-Chief of American military has displayed some shockingly lackadaisical actions with regard to decision making about military action, and lack thereof. Think Benghazi. Think about helping Israel. So, if I were on the other side of the DMZ I could expect a SLOW and INCOMPLETE response to any military action take from the North – which is tempting. And I think Obama may want that. He places American personnel in danger, unconsciously, out of a desire to have them slaughtered, at least that’s what it looks like to me. This is one reason I think he supports abortion…it is a perpetual slaughter. Yes, I think his mind is diseased to that degree. So, add everything up and I am not sure what can be done to avoid a terrible slaughter.
India and Pakistan avoided that scenario 10-15 years ago, but those countries were influenced by higher spiritual values than the gross pigs we have involved as the parties of the Korean confrontation. Don’t expect a rosy outcome.
Comments (2)
addendum: the NSA leaks situation is a real threat to China’s current business leadership. Snowden’s leaks clearly unmask the Intell-Military takeover of the American government. This weakens China’s business leadership in the face of US spying, and forces the option for military solutions to the geo-political gameboard called: Earth. What we need to see come out now is how the NSA spying not only compromises business related data, but China military data also. This subject has been opened already in regard to China military spying on USA, but not much yet has surfaced on what USA spying effects have had on China military operations and capability. We DID see that Struxnet hurt Iran, and we know that Israel was in on that. The USA intel-military take over of the American government has happened in concert with Israel’s similar takeover after the assassination of Itzak Rabin by Likud interests. Thus Struxnet is a product of the Israel-USA intell-military “security” alliance, which is primarily nuclear. However, Obama is a loose canon in that arrangement. A product of Intelligence side of the Intell-Military Alliance, Obama secured the Democratic election. (If he had lost, McCain was the Intell/Military candidate on the Republican side.) But Obama is something more. He is an AntiChrist figure, very probably possessed by a demonic spirit, as is his wife, an even higher (aka, lower) ranking evil spirit. I can see them both entering homosexual relationships very soon now that gay marriage is potentially legal nationwide. Wow! This is a huge tie-in of so many diverse factions. I think I’ve got them all juggling in the air in a very balanced way so as to make perfect sense. It all makes sense because the takeover of the American government by the Intell/Military Alliance provided the opportunity for covert action to become standard operational procedure, which it has. Obama’s crusade to destroy the Catholic Church is due to the fact that the Church is the ONLY worldwide public institution absolutely committed to hold its ground against Evil in all its forms. – The usurping of political power away from THE PEOPLE is an evil, as is covert political operations against the inalienable human rights of the populace. So, what are we looking at here? What prognostication is on the horizon?
Well, several….
addendum A1: as of June 2013 the military tension on the Korean peninsula seems to have geared down a notch, or two. But I think that may soon reverse. What has happened is that China leadership has been able to chastise Kim economically. By withdrawing economic assistance from Kim, China business leadership has been able to make North Korea aware that the China military faction is not its Master. So far so good. But the Edward Snowden affair will be seen to serve the military faction inside China because it shows that the USA has the China business leadership cornered (as in the game GO) – which is the model for all China’s governmental strategy, both business and military. So, soon, China strategy can be expected to take a more military turn of events. For instance, it’s military will simply take some object of interest. This action will be taken under the (coerced) blessing of the civilian leadership, seen as retaliation for the insult of NSA spying. Some island, or some base somewhere, maybe even in Nicaragua. This will serve as a case study on how the USA will react, a test on the USA’s range of options. Internally, in China, it will signal a resurgence of clout for the military faction.